- From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
- Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 14:43:14 +1300
- To: Matt Rakow <marakow@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 7 November 2014 01:43:43 UTC
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote: > I think it's important to soon resolve the issue about what to do for > mandatory snapping when there's no reachable snappoint. I propose that if > there are no reachable snappoints at all, no snapping occurs. > Correction: "if there are no snappoints at all". Rob -- oIo otoeololo oyooouo otohoaoto oaonoyooonoeo owohooo oioso oaonogoroyo owoiotoho oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro owoiololo oboeo osouobojoeocoto otooo ojouodogomoeonoto.o oAogoaoiono,o oaonoyooonoeo owohooo osoaoyoso otooo oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro,o o‘oRoaocoao,o’o oioso oaonosowoeoroaoboloeo otooo otohoeo ocooouoroto.o oAonodo oaonoyooonoeo owohooo osoaoyoso,o o‘oYooouo ofooooolo!o’o owoiololo oboeo oiono odoaonogoeoro ooofo otohoeo ofoioroeo ooofo ohoeololo.
Received on Friday, 7 November 2014 01:43:43 UTC