- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 17:29:22 -0800
- To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com> wrote: > On 06/11/2014 01:31, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > >> I don't understand. What do you think is different between >> alt-per-url and alt-for-whole thing? > > > Inject "new warning" or "new. warning." into a content reader > then try "new" followed by "warning". You'll understand the > difference. In HTML, the alt attribute works literally by subbing the text in for the image. There's no difference, to a screen reader, between "<img alt=new> <img alt=warning>" and "new warning". Why do you think this should be different in CSS? If this mechanism is *insufficient*, that's one thing. But as it stands, it's equally powerful to HTML to say: .new.warning { content: url("new.jpg") url("warning.jpg"); alt: "new warning"; } ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 6 November 2014 01:30:10 UTC