- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 16:31:46 -0800
- To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com> wrote: > On 05/11/2014 22:17, Alan Stearns wrote: > >>> p.new.important::before { >>> content: url(warning.png) url(new.png); >>> } >> >> >> Ah, sorry. I thought you were talking about fallbacks, not more than one >> image being displayed. >> >> I don’t see an issue with this case. You have three selectors setting >> three different content values. You can easily add three separate alt >> values. Of course, this works just fine with alt being a separate property >> *or* being an additional value on the content property (perhaps separated >> by an 'alt' keyword?) > > > This is something you don't get: the three rules I wrote should not set > 3 different alt values but 4. The one quoted above does not define one > single alt but two for two different images. The way a content reader > will pronounce them is different from "warning new" or "warning. new." > It will add some mention saying these are two different texts because > it's important to the listener. So the only possibility for the alt is > to be carried by the url() notion. I don't understand. What do you think is different between alt-per-url and alt-for-whole thing? ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 6 November 2014 00:39:35 UTC