- From: Manuel Rego Casasnovas <rego@igalia.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 23:20:49 +0200
- To: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Hi, I've a doubt regarding auto-placement algorithm [1]. Imagine that we have a 3x3 grid without grid-auto-flow property defined. This means that the grid grows in the row direction when needed, and that the auto-placement algorithm is *sparse*. The HTML would be something like this: <div style="display: grid; grid-template-rows: 100px 100px 100px; grid-template-columns: 100px 100px 100px;"> <div>A</div> <div style="grid-row: span 2; grid-column: span 2;">B</div> <div>C</div> </div> Let's review the values of the auto-placement cursor. 1) Initially it's set to 1/1. 2) Then we place "A" item in the 1/1 position. The cursor is still 1/1. 3) "B" is placed in the 1/2 position (taking 1/2, 1/3, 2/2 and 2/3 cells). The cursor is set to 1/2. 4) Finally "C" is placed in 2/1. The result will be like in the following diagram: ------------- | A | B | B | ------------- | C | B | B | ------------- | | | | ------------- I guess that in this case, we can consider that elements appear out-of-order (which shouldn't happen in sparse mode). However, I'm wondering if in step 3), the auto-placement cursor should be set to 2/3 (the last occupied cell) instead of 1/2 (the first one). In that case "C" will be placed in 3/1. And the result would be something like this: ------------- | A | B | B | ------------- | | B | B | ------------- | C | | | ------------- This situation seems to follow sparse concept better, and items appear in the right order. If this is right, probably the auto-placement algorithm wording should be modified to specify this. What would be the right result? Thank you very much, Rego [1] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-grid/#auto-placement
Received on Thursday, 26 June 2014 21:21:26 UTC