- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 01:49:43 -0700
- To: "Phillips, Addison" <addison@lab126.com>, "CSS WWW Style (www-style@w3.org)" <www-style@w3.org>
- CC: www International <www-international@w3.org>
On 01/24/2014 10:15 AM, Phillips, Addison wrote: > State: > OPEN WG comment > Product: > CSS3-text > Raised by: > Addison Phillips > Opened on: > 2013-12-06 > Description: > 1. Section 1.3: The description of "grapheme cluster" feels abbreviated > and terse. Of particular concern to me is this sentence: > > -- > The UA may further tailor the definition as required by typographical tradition. > -- > > We think this could be clearer, perhaps by saying something similar to: > > -- > The UA may extend grapheme cluster boundaries as required by the typographical > traditions, as identified by the content's language. [See discussion of > "extended graphame cluster" in Section 3 of UAX#29] > -- The suggested text is not an improvement, it's worse: - Replacement of "tailor" with "extend" is incorrect, since sometimes (as in Thai) they are decomposed. - Tailorings do not always depend on the content language. They may depend on one or more of the following: - script - content language - font style and possibly - typesetting preferences, in cases where multiple options are considered valid and reasonable Rejecting this comment as no change, since I think the dictionary definition of "typographic tradition" is sufficiently precise. Note that exact tailorings are out-of-scope for the CSS spec. If a spec is needed, it should be requested as an expansion of UAX29. ~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 24 June 2014 15:37:41 UTC