W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > June 2014

Re: Why not max/min-font-size? & extend them to other properties of sizes

From: Rafał Pietrak <rafal@ztk-rp.eu>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 09:29:19 +0200
Message-ID: <53A13FCF.1030307@ztk-rp.eu>
To: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
W dniu 17.06.2014 23:55, Tab Atkins Jr. pisze:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Rafał Pietrak <rafal@ztk-rp.eu> wrote:
>> px do not work there at all.
>> I'd quess, that it's because px are "ill defined". It's define as "smallest
>> visible feature". Thus 1px lines *are visible* on my HTC just fine. The
>> problem is that 20px "font-size", while perfectly readable on my notebook,
>> is microscopic and unreadable on my HTC.
> That is not the definition of px, this is:
> <http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-values/#absolute-lengths>. px is
> literally defined as an arc of visual angle.

Right. The default scaling (e.g. without an apropriate meta) have 
misslead me. Sorry for the fuzz.

Received on Wednesday, 18 June 2014 07:30:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:43 UTC