- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 13:56:22 -0700
- To: "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org>
- Cc: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote: > Following up on the F2F notes... > > For offset*: getBoxQuads totally subsumes these properties and avoids the > craziness of offsetParent at the same time. I don't think we need to add > anything more here. So you mean we could just ignore those entirely and declare them legacy, trusting gBQ to address the problem with subpixel precision? > For scroll*: per list feedback, these are the properties that we reallly > want to support subpixel for. Maybe the compat impact of changing just these > properties to float would be acceptable? It wasn't clear to me from the > discussion. Maybe we'll find out soon :-). We had some breakage with internal properties last time we tried to do so, but I believe they've been fixed now. We keep trying to just turn this on. > For client*: I think the simplest way forward for these properties (and for > scroll*, if we need to) is to add new box types to BoxType that expose an > element's scrollport rect and "scrolled content" rects. Yes please! I still have no idea what scroll/client/offset actually mean until I look up a tutorial, every time. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 12 June 2014 20:57:09 UTC