- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 15:33:39 +0200
- To: Manuel Rego Casasnovas <rego@igalia.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Manuel Rego Casasnovas <rego@igalia.com> wrote: > Hi, > > reviewing the spec I've found the following sentence in > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-grid/#grid-placement-errors: > "If the grid item has an automatic position and a grid span for a named > line in a given dimension, instead treat the grid span as one." > > If I understood it correctly, that means that something like this: > grid-row: auto; > grid-column: span namedgridline; > > Will become: > grid-row: auto; > grid-column: span 1; > > I'd like to confirm that this is the expected behaviour and the > rationale behind it. This, that's correct and intentional. The reason for it is that if you don't know where you're going to end up in a given dimension, spanning to a particular line doesn't seem to make any sense; it means that your size might vary wildly based on where you land. Since it's almost certainly an error, we cut it off early, so it's hopefully more obvious. > BTW, current implementation in Blink allows to use a named grid line in > that case. File a bug. ^_^ ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 5 June 2014 13:34:27 UTC