- From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 10:28:33 +0200
- To: "Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: "www-style list" <www-style@w3.org>
On Sat, 26 Jul 2014 08:43:39 +0200, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote: > On Wed, 23 Jul 2014 05:46:10 +0200, Tab Atkins Jr. > <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 6:59 PM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote: >>> On 7/22/14, 9:05 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >>>> I propose we add a third overload that takes just a ScrollOptions >>>> dict >>> >>> You mean just change the first overload to take an optional (has to >>> be; it's >>> a dictionary) ScrollOptions dict, right? >> >> Yeah. >> >>>> If no one's implemented the current ScrollOptions overload yet >>> >>> Gecko has it implemented, but it hasn't shipped yet. We can probably >>> change >>> it if the changes happen soonish. >>> >>>> That way you either >>>> call the function with the legacy boolean arg, or with the modern dict >>>> arg, not both. >>> >>> This generally makes sense to me. >> >> Cool. zcorpan, what do you think? If you're cool with it, we can >> pull a CfC on the list and hopefully get it approved and edited within >> a week. > > Sounds OK. Hmm, hold on. How do we retain the behavior of scrollIntoView(undefined)? See http://www.w3.org/mid/53C04B43.6030800@mit.edu -- Simon Pieters Opera Software
Received on Saturday, 26 July 2014 08:29:06 UTC