- From: 河内 隆仁 <kochi@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 15:16:15 +0900
- To: www-style@w3.org
- Cc: Elliott Sprehn <esprehn@google.com>, Steve Orvell <sorvell@google.com>, Hayato Ito <hayato@google.com>
Received on Friday, 25 July 2014 06:18:30 UTC
Hi, Recently we had a discussion about how (A) :host(::before) { ... } (B) :host::before { ... } should match. Our local conclusion was that a pseudo-class (like ::before) works like a combinator and (A) should be rejected at CSS parser level as :host() can only contain a compound selector, while (B) should match, like :host::shadow which is already in the spec (http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-scoping/ , example 6). However, we were not sure in which a pseudo element like ::before is categorized, as http://dev.w3.org/csswg/selectors4/, section 3.1 Structure and Terminology, says nothing about "pseudo element" (in contrast, pseudo class is a simple selector). Let us know your thoughts about (A) and (B) above. Relevant Chromium bugs: https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=393490 https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=393509 -- Takayoshi Kochi
Received on Friday, 25 July 2014 06:18:30 UTC