- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 22:23:58 -0700
- To: Shane Stephens <shans@google.com>
- Cc: Dean Jackson <dino@apple.com>, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>, Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Shane Stephens <shans@google.com> wrote: >> As it turns out, you'd actually need to apply these in the order >> translate, scale, rotate to get the result you've pointed out as natural. >> And it's the fact that even obvious transform wizards like yourself get this >> wrong which is motivating me to want us to add this affordance (Francois >> made a very similar point). > > Ah, my bad. I just realized that you have the order correct. Sorry about > that :) Substitute my confusion for your own. I'm not sure which result he thought was natural, or which order he thought was applying - it was unclear from the email - but the "rotated rectangle" result is definitely what comes out of my proposal. The "squished diamond" isn't what you'd get from independent properties; it comes from a TSR ordering. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 17 July 2014 05:24:45 UTC