Re: [css-transforms] Making 'transform' match author expectations better with specialized 'rotate'/etc shorthands

> On 16 Jul 2014, at 11:56 am, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I also forgot about the previous points regarding origins, so let's
> put in one for rotate and scale.  This brings us back up to 5
> properties:
> 
> * translate
> * rotate
> * rotate-origin
> * scale
> * scale-origin

Since you're suggesting properties, shouldn't these be "translation" and "rotation"? "rotate" is a verb (makes sense as a function name). "scale" can be both, so you'll only need to add parentheses when you realise the order isn't what you wanted.

Dean

Received on Wednesday, 16 July 2014 02:13:27 UTC