- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 14:16:02 -0700
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote: > On 7/15/14, 4:39 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> Yes, of course. I just meant that if, say, there's some naked text >> mixed with a ruby-text box (which I think wraps the naked text in an >> anonymous ruby-base box ordinarily?) > > No, naked text is OK in ruby-text. > > Did you mean this situation: > > data:text/html,<div style="display: ruby; position: absolute">Some > text</div> > > ? or something else? Sorry, let me be more detailed. Without reading the spec, I think that the following markup: <div display:ruby>base text<div display:ruby-text>ruby stuff</div></div> results in the naked "base text" part getting wrapped in an anonymous ruby-base box. (If this doesn't happen, this digression of mine is invalid, but also, I think that should be fixed.) I just want to make sure that the following markup: <div display:ruby position:absolute>base text<div display:ruby-text>ruby stuff</div></div> still ends up with "base text" being wrapped in a ruby-base box and associated with the following ruby-text block. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 15 July 2014 21:16:49 UTC