- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 13:39:39 -0700
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote: > On 7/15/14, 4:17 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> >> Agree, assuming this means the contents all wrap themselves in an >> anonymous ruby box > > If the contents are ruby-base(-container) or ruby-text(-container), yes. Yes, of course. I just meant that if, say, there's some naked text mixed with a ruby-text box (which I think wraps the naked text in an anonymous ruby-base box ordinarily?), it should keep the same behavior. I'm not sure if the wrapping behavior changes based on whether there's a ruby parent or not. > If you have a ruby-base-container root with a block kid, I don't think you > should get any anonymous boxes or any ruby behavior at all.[1] Yeah, sure. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 15 July 2014 20:40:26 UTC