- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 13:07:08 -0700
- To: Rafal Pietrak <rafal@ztk-rp.eu>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Rafal Pietrak <rafal@ztk-rp.eu> wrote: > What I tried to say is, that all this just adds up to conclusion, that > instead of supplementing current svg drawing model with c.a 20 new > properties entangled with current transforms, most of the cases could > probably be addressed by uniform introduction of (some) local coordinate > system. This works for cairographics, could work here. Hm, I'm not sure how that addresses any of this, though. Note that transforms *already* deal with local coordinate systems - whenever you transform an element, you're actually transforming the coordinate system it uses (which is why there's a difference between "rotate(90deg) translateX(100px)" and "translateX(100px) rotate(90deg)"). Can you elaborate on what you're suggesting, and how you think it might help? I suspect there's an inferential gap I'm not crossing. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 15 July 2014 20:07:58 UTC