Re: [css-transforms] Making 'transform' match author expectations better with specialized 'rotate'/etc shorthands from Dirk Schulze on 2014-07-14 (www-style@w3.org from July 2014)

From: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 06:22:46 +0000
To: Sylvain Galineau <galineau@adobe.com>
CC: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "<www-style@w3.org>" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BB81EE56-7BB6-4991-9569-BEA46F2C49F7@adobe.com>

On Jul 14, 2014, at 2:16 AM, Sylvain Galineau <galineau@adobe.com> wrote:
> 
> I would note that SVG rotations follow this exact pattern i.e. you specify the angle and an optional rotation origin. This allows each rotate to define its own origin, something the current CSS model does not support.

Well, it does[1] it is just not implemented yet.

Greetings,
Dirk

[1] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-transforms/#rotate-three-function


> 
> 
>

Received on Monday, 14 July 2014 06:23:18 UTC