> On Jul 12, 2014, at 8:47 AM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > > Validating the author's mistake was only one of the reasons behind my > proposal (the other was allowing some basic "separation" of > transforms, so you could, say, animate something's position with > 'translate', while rotating it on hover). That said, don't write it > off. Common authoring mistakes are a sign that *we* made a mistake; > it means that something does not match a common internal model. > Sometimes that's fine, and authors just need to learn how it works; > other times it means we should tweak things to move closer to the > author's internal model. > > If you read the tail end of that Twitter thread, you see a bunch of > authors sounding off enthusiastically about this. This is *very* > common, and would make a lot of authors very happy, I think. I agree. We should do this.Received on Saturday, 12 July 2014 18:20:25 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:44 UTC