- From: François REMY <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2014 11:32:12 +0200
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: "CSS WG" <www-style@w3.org>
> You forget that this isn't true in all cases. Because of the "last if not > enough lines" rule, you may already end up with less than 3 cells covered > (the intention is to stay in the explicit grid, and removing the name > constraints does allow to break that assumption). I was off a few days, but I would still like to reformulate another proposal here now I understand your reasoning better. What if instead we specified that "span 3 invalid-name" spans to : - the minimum of -- a span of 3 lines (with no name constraint) -- the last line of the explicit grid With this algorithm, we try to preserve as much as possible the two assumptions of this kind of span: -- at least three lines will be spanned -- the span will not cross the explicit grid boundaries While this is open for debate, I would propose to apply this rule in two cases: - no line is named "invalid-name" at all. - no line is named "invalid-name" after the line from which the span is computed. (currently, the second one reverts to a span of 1 after error correction) Thoughts?
Received on Friday, 4 July 2014 09:32:25 UTC