- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 19:15:12 -0700
- To: Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>
- Cc: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com> wrote: > On 06/30/2014 03:29 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >>> Based on that assumption, I think we could perhaps more narrowly scope >>> the new min-width:auto behavior to address this use case case. In >>> particular: instead of making min-width/min-height:auto pull from the >>> computed width/height, we could instead make it pull from the computed >>> "flex-basis", **when computed flex-basis is auto**. >> >> Why not just make it always pull from 'flex-basis'? I think having it >> pull from 'width' might have been an accident. That would have the >> same benefits you cite in the rest of your email. > > That would break the "flex: [positive-number]" use-case, I think. Ah, that makes sense. Sure, your suggested change sounds good to me then. I'll discuss it with fantasai tomorrow and decide on it on the call Wednesday. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 1 July 2014 02:15:59 UTC