- From: Andrei Bucur <abucur@adobe.com>
- Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 16:14:00 +0000
- To: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Ignore the codepen.io link. I donšt know how it got there. Sorry for the noise, Andrei. >Hello! > >I'd like to clarify a bit how parallel flows work, especially when >interacting with auto-height fragment containers such as regions. Here is >a list of the questions (with images :)!) I have in mind: > >http://goo.gl/3waawp <http://codepen.io/abucur/full/fBKGh> > >And also listed in the email body: > >1. In case there are multiple parallel flows in a region having forced >breaks inside them, which one is used to select the height of the region? >(e.g. floats with forced breaks inside + normal flow with forced break >inside). If only normal flow forced breaks are considered for auto-height >regions to determine the height of the region, what is the processing >model for laying out floats? > > >2. Forced breaks before/after floats are a part of the float flow or the >parent flow? If yes, content that should flow around a float that was >shifted to another fragment container flows around the gap left inside the >content by the float or it ignores it? > >3. What happens when break-after: always applied on a float meets >break-before: always applied on content with float clearance? The two >forced breaks are merged into one? How do you define this in terms of >parallel flows? > >4. How do you balance the content of a multi-column element when it has >floats with forced breaks inside of it? Do you take into account just the >forced breaks inside the normal flow? > >5. Imagine there are two auto-height regions (A and B) with no normal flow >content, only one monolithic float (e.g. video elements). What's the size >of the regions? >a. A has a height of 0px and B has the height of the tallest float? - this >contradicts the 1px advancement rule in the css3-break spec. >b. A has a height of 1px and contains the floats? Because it's a BFC it >will be expanded to the height of the tallest float and B will have height >0px? > >Thanks, >Andrei. > >
Received on Friday, 31 January 2014 16:14:48 UTC