- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 10:16:37 -0800
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Cc: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 9:47 AM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: > As I pointed out in the working group meeting today, I'd prefer if > the exception said that the rules are overridden only if the > relevant spec explicitly says they're overridden. This means that > provisions in specifications that aren't intended to override these > rules won't be interpreted to override them. (I suspect there are > probably quite a few things that could be interpreted to override > this rule.) > > I think there was general agreement in the meeting about this > proposal. > > (This idea is modeled somewhat on > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_Thirty-three_of_the_Canadian_Charter_of_Rights_and_Freedoms .) Done! ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 28 January 2014 18:17:24 UTC