On 2014/01/26 1:16, John Cowan wrote: > Presumably a font-kludge encoding, one that maps either 0x00-0xFF, > 0x80-0xFF, or U+F000-U+FFFF (the Microsoft dingbat range) to the needed > characters. I don't know much about the "Microsoft dingbat range", but U+F000-U+FFFF looks too big to be true. Regards, Martin.Received on Sunday, 26 January 2014 06:12:56 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:36 UTC