W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2014

Re: [css-regions] responsive and semantic use of named flows

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 17:29:04 +1300
Message-ID: <CAOp6jLbXqbxuq0WxFBEWbsZtBfy_=bWchOg+tnEkGP-PEtPViA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com> wrote:

> On 1/25/14, 12:50 PM, "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote:
> >For example, a simple variation on your use-case would be to have the
> ><aside> take up less than the full width of the body, and allow article
> >text to flow to the right of it. Then it's obviously a float and your
> >region approach won't work.
>
> I agree that removing the viewport height constraint changes the use case.
>

I wasn't suggesting doing that.

Rob
-- 
Jtehsauts  tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy  Mdaon  yhoaus  eanuttehrotraiitny  eovni
le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o  Whhei csha iids  teoa
stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d  'mYaonu,r  "sGients  uapr,e  tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
'm aotr  atnod  sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t"  uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n?  gBoutt  uIp
waanndt  wyeonut  thoo mken.o w
Received on Sunday, 26 January 2014 04:29:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:39 UTC