Re: Proposal: will-change property (formerly will-animate) from Tab Atkins Jr. on 2014-01-24 (www-style@w3.org from January 2014)

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 14:58:11 -0800
To: Pavel Curtis <pavelc@microsoft.com>
Cc: James Robinson <jamesr@google.com>, "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org>, Benoit Girard <bgirard@mozilla.com>, www-style <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDD1-ffPPm8jDdnE_byb_LBSvQAXNGKRU6XmQy7pxo-1XQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Pavel Curtis <pavelc@microsoft.com> wrote:
> No, we’re reading the same things.  I’m just suggesting that we need another
> sentence in the ‘will-change’ spec along similar lines:
>
>> If any non-initial value of a property would make the element a containing
>> block for fixed-positioned descendants, then specifying that property in
>> “will-change” must make the element a containing block for fixed-positioned
>> descendants.

I've just added a parenthetical to the existing statement to cover this.

~TJ

Received on Friday, 24 January 2014 22:58:58 UTC