On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Asmus Freytag <asmusf@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > On 1/23/2014 10:18 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> So, in sum: >> >> 1. Nobody should be using @charset in the first place. We only retain >> it for legacy purposes, and new stylesheets should just be done in >> utf-8. >> 2. There is a realistic concern that we're already under legacy >> constraints to not loosen the syntax. >> 3. CSS parsing allows for *far* more variation than just "more spaces >> and either type of quote". >> 4. UAs are very unlikely to implement the full flexibility of CSS >> parsing just for encoding detection. >> 5. If we specify only a subset of allowed variation, the original goal >> of making encoding detection aligned with valid @charset rules is >> still not satisfied. >> >> For all these reasons, I strongly reject any proposal to change the >> current specification regarding the strictness of the encoding >> declaration syntax. > > Succinctly reasoned. > > Will the spec be written accordingly? It already is written accordingly. Unless you mean something more specific? ~TJReceived on Thursday, 23 January 2014 20:28:22 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:38 UTC