- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 16:55:47 -0800
- To: Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <20140123005547.GB9632@crum.dbaron.org>
On Wednesday 2011-10-12 15:39 +0200, Øyvind Stenhaug wrote: > The term "animation properties" is not defined, and its usage > appears to be inconsistent. > > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-animations/#the-animation-fill-mode-property- > "If the value for ‘animation-fill-mode’ is ‘both’, then the > animation will follow the rules for both ‘forwards’ and ‘backwards’. > That is, it will extend the animation properties in both > directions." > > Here the meaning seems to be "the properties being animated". I believe this usage is inconsistent with all other usage in the spec, and should be fixed. I've fixed it in https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/rev/cf1ae0fbbaa5 . > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-animations/#the-animation-shorthand-property- > "The ‘animation’ shorthand property combines seven of the animation > properties into a single property." > > Here, the meaning is "properties whose name begins with > 'animation-'". (There are other occurrences as well) I've fixed the remainder of the issue by defining the term in https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/rev/deda8e62bf11 . -David -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling in or walling out, And to whom I was like to give offense. - Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914)
Received on Thursday, 23 January 2014 00:56:20 UTC