- From: Jens O. Meiert <jens@meiert.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 23:10:35 -0300
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: W3C WWW Style <www-style@w3.org>
> Neither of those specs are active modules. Content, at least, has an > obsoletion notice (well, on its ED; don't look at /TR until they start > letting us put EDs on there). Is there a (more effective) way to mark drafts as inactive/outdated/obsolete? As this looks like something the W3C could generally have an interest in for spec management purposes, is this on anyone’s agenda there? For CSS and out of curiosity, who’s tracking all of this, is that you, or a shared responsibility among working group members? > The correct definition is CSS 2.1 right now, and soon it will be > Display <http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-display/> (I'm still working on > that one, but will polish it up in time for the CSSWG f2f at the end > of this month). That helps (will use the CSS 2.1 spec for purposes of the index). -- Jens O. Meiert http://meiert.com/en/
Received on Wednesday, 22 January 2014 02:11:31 UTC