- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 10:18:55 +0000
- To: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
- Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>, www-style <www-style@w3.org>, WWW International <www-international@w3.org>
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:24 PM, John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> wrote: > Feh. Do we really suck so much that this result is unavoidable? I'd like > to see the syntax definition of the @charset rule narrowed to match the > @charset marker. Is that impossible? The CSS parser operates on code points. A correct @charset marker can only be done at the byte level. E.g. if you have a BOM preceding the marker, the CSS parser will not see the BOM and might think the @charset marker to be correct, but it would not be. -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Thursday, 16 January 2014 10:19:26 UTC