On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 2:44 AM, Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com> wrote: > On 11/01/2014 10:25 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote: > >> On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com >> >wrote: >> >> overflow:scroll is *not* just >>> "overflow:visible, but we don't show the overflow and instead you can >>> scroll to it" >>> >> >> >> No, that's exactly what it is in Gecko/IE (and the spec). >> > > This spec does not define what happens to the padding-box. It does not > state anywhere that the padding-box should be clipped so Gecko/IE can not > be said to follow the spec where what is in question is undefined. Gecko/IE are not "ciipping the padding box". Gecko and IE are simply setting the padding-box to the same value regardless of the value of 'overflow' (except, when scrollbars are visible, its edges are moved in by the scrollbar width). Since the spec doesn't say 'overflow' should cause the padding-box to be computed differently from normal (except for the scrollbar width detail), the spec currently requires the Gecko/IE behavior. Rob -- Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r "sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr, 'm aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t" uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n? gBoutt uIp waanndt wyeonut thoo mken.o w
Received on Saturday, 11 January 2014 20:24:21 UTC