Re: padding lost in overflow

> On Jan 10, 2014, at 2:24 PM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <> wrote:
> It seems more logical to lay out the contents normally, as if you were
> doing overflow:visible, then grow the content box to fully contain the
> contents, and wrap the padding box around that as normal.  The first
> part is what we do already; it's really weird that the content box is
> allowed to overflow the padding box.

I completely agree. 

Received on Friday, 10 January 2014 23:00:10 UTC