On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote: > Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> This would mean that scoped stylesheets by themselves aren't affected, >> since their nearest scoping root (using the above definition) isn't >> their scoping element, but rather the document or their shadow root. >> I suggest letting them work and define global names normally. In >> other words, what I'm describing here has nothing do with scoped >> stylesheets at all (so we do option #1); it instead cares about the >> vaguely-similar concepts of ID-scoping roots. > > Why? I feel like scoped style sheets should work just like style sheets > defined in shadow trees, for scoping of names. Because it's harder and slower to do a tree-walk like that, where jumping to an ID-scoping root is cheap. Also, because it solves the shadow-DOM problem quite nicely, and I don't care as much about scoped style sheets. ^_^ ~TJReceived on Wednesday, 26 February 2014 23:00:49 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:40 UTC