- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 14:19:07 -0800
- To: Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com> wrote: > In the current draft, "character" is used as a unit to describe the > length limitation user agents could apply for some systems. However, > as Simon Sapin mentioned in another thread, "character" is an > ambiguous unit, which could refer to either Unicode code points or > grapheme clusters. > > Things could even get more complex when we start discussing the exact > meaning of "character" here. I believe what you meant via this word > was in fact grapheme clusters. But if it means grapheme clusters, the > limitation will be completely useless, since a grapheme cluster could > contain arbitrary number of Unicode code points. However, if the > "character" here means Unicode code points, 20 code points might not > be enough for some counter styles, as a symbol may contains some > cluster extenders to describe one grapheme. > > I suggest to allow 60-100 Unicode code points instead. Good catch. Changed it to 60 codepoints. ~TJ
Received on Monday, 24 February 2014 22:20:00 UTC