- From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 19:51:13 +0100
- To: Aharon (Vladimir) Lanin <aharon@google.com>
- Cc: Lina Kemmel <LKEMMEL@il.ibm.com>, "Amir E. Aharoni" <amir.aharoni@mail.huji.ac.il>, Behdad Esfahbod <behdad@behdad.org>, Behdad Esfahbod <behdad@google.com>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, jfkthame@gmail.com, "public-i18n-bidi@w3.org" <public-i18n-bidi@w3.org>, Simon Montagu <smontagu@mozilla.com>, WWW International <www-international@w3.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
My example with the Google logo might not be so valid, since Google uses the same font style and font weight in all its characters - it only differs color and color still counts as same font (face, style, and weight). But nevertheless, logos is a case were one might want to vary each character in the word by more - or other things - than by color. Leif Halvard Silli Leif Halvard Silli, Sun, 23 Feb 2014 17:45:36 +0100: > Aharon (Vladimir) Lanin, Sun, 23 Feb 2014 15:16:51 +0200: >> No idea. Why would someone do that? > > You work in Google? Here is an answer to you question: > > <div class=GoogleLogo color=blue > >G<span color=red > >o</span><span color=yellow > >o</span> > g<span color=green > >l</span><span color=red > >e</span> > </div> > > Leif Halvard Silli > > > >> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Lina Kemmel <LKEMMEL@il.ibm.com> wrote: >> >>>> Not sure what you mean. To state the obvious, as opposed to Arabic >>>> where the same Unicode character is used in any position in the word, >>>> and the desired form is chosen by the renderer automatically, in Hebrew >>>> different Unicode characters are used for the final and non-final forms >>>> (for those few characters that have final forms). >>> >>> I thought about spell-checking and auto-complete, but sorry - it's >>> relevant not only for final letters and not only for Hebrew. >>> >>> <div spellcheck="true" contenteditable="true"> >>> Wel<span style="color:blue; margin:10px;">l done</span></div> >>> >>> Should it indicate misspelling? >>> >>> >
Received on Sunday, 23 February 2014 18:51:42 UTC