- From: Lea Verou <lea@verou.me>
- Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 19:19:13 +0200
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
That’s not why I was confused, but I tested it in UAs and it is double indeed. I guess I was confused because the color transition is not linear, so it *seemed* smaller. On Feb 19, 2014, at 19:01, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 4:12 AM, Lea Verou <lea@verou.me> wrote: >> In [1] there's a note that says: >>> Note this means for a long, straight shadow edge, the blur radius will >>> create a visibly apparent color transition approximately the twice length of >>> the blur radius that is perpendicular to and centered on the shadow's edge, >>> and that ranges from almost the full shadow color at the endpoint inside the >>> shadow to almost fully transparent at the endpoint outside it. >> >> Shouldn’t this be “the length of the blur radius” instead of “twice the >> length of the blur radius”? > > Nope, the blur radius says how far out from the original sharp edge > the blur will extend. But the blur is symmetric, so it affects the > color *within* the original shape as well, by the same distance. Thus > the total area affected by blurring is twice the blur radius. > > ~TJ >
Received on Wednesday, 19 February 2014 17:19:37 UTC