- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:18:42 -0800
- To: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Cc: www International <www-international@w3.org>, W3C Style <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org> wrote: > 6.2 Alphabetic: lower-alpha, lower-latin, upper-alpha, upper-latin, > lower-greek, hiragana, hiragana-iroha, katakana, katakana-iroha > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-counter-styles/#simple-alphabetic > > The hiragana, katakana, hiragana-iroha, and katakana-iroha seem to be > implemented in the same way in Firefox, Chrome, Safari, and now Opera. The > implementation differs from the spec only by the addition of one or two > characters to the basic set. > > Should we change the spec to align with the implementations? > > For more information see the test results at > http://www.w3.org/International/tests/repository/css3-counter-styles/predefined-styles/results-cstyles#simplealpha It's weird that the spec differs from implementations. I don't *think* I revised those algorithms at all. I'd prefer to go ahead and match implementations unless they're totally off. ~TJ
Received on Friday, 14 February 2014 23:19:40 UTC