Re: [counter-styles] i18n-ISSUE-339: Should Japanese spec styles match implementations or vice versa?

On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Richard Ishida <> wrote:
> 6.2 Alphabetic: lower-alpha, lower-latin, upper-alpha, upper-latin,
> lower-greek, hiragana, hiragana-iroha, katakana, katakana-iroha
> The hiragana, katakana, hiragana-iroha, and katakana-iroha seem to be
> implemented in the same way in Firefox, Chrome, Safari, and now Opera. The
> implementation differs from the spec only by the addition of one or two
> characters to the basic set.
> Should we change the spec to align with the implementations?
> For more information see the test results at

It's weird that the spec differs from implementations.  I don't
*think* I revised those algorithms at all.

I'd prefer to go ahead and match implementations unless they're totally off.


Received on Friday, 14 February 2014 23:19:40 UTC