- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 12:14:02 -0800
- To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Daniel Glazman
<daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com> wrote:
> On 13/02/14 20:02, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>> #foo::attr(title) { color: red; }
>>
>> It would be a valid rule that just had no effect on your document,
>> exactly the same as:
>>
>> #foo::before { color: red; } (Note the lack of 'content', so no box generated.)
>
> And _just that above_ is the explanation I think should be added
> to the spec. It does clarify the situation that I find underspecified
> otherwise.
While I could certainly add it as a note, it's not needed normatively.
Would that be okay?
~TJ
Received on Thursday, 13 February 2014 20:14:49 UTC