- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 12:14:02 -0800
- To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com> wrote: > On 13/02/14 20:02, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> #foo::attr(title) { color: red; } >> >> It would be a valid rule that just had no effect on your document, >> exactly the same as: >> >> #foo::before { color: red; } (Note the lack of 'content', so no box generated.) > > And _just that above_ is the explanation I think should be added > to the spec. It does clarify the situation that I find underspecified > otherwise. While I could certainly add it as a note, it's not needed normatively. Would that be okay? ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 13 February 2014 20:14:49 UTC