Re: [css-containment] ED of Containment ready for review (was overflow:clip)

On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Ojan Vafai <> wrote:

> That's a good point. I suppose my leaning towards disallowing it comes
> from wanting the containment to be as strict as possible so that web
> authors can use contain:strict and not need to worry about the exceptions
> that break the containment. The downside to that is that it means SVG clip
> paths now need to know about contain:strictness, which is a bit of a bummer.

Not just clip-path but element() and fill:url() anything else that can use
url() syntax to refer to an element in the document.

Jtehsauts  tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy  Mdaon  yhoaus  eanuttehrotraiitny  eovni
le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o  Whhei csha iids  teoa
stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d  'mYaonu,r  "sGients  uapr,e  tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
'm aotr  atnod  sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t"  uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n?  gBoutt  uIp
waanndt  wyeonut  thoo mken.o w

Received on Thursday, 13 February 2014 08:49:59 UTC