On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org> wrote: > That's a good point. I suppose my leaning towards disallowing it comes > from wanting the containment to be as strict as possible so that web > authors can use contain:strict and not need to worry about the exceptions > that break the containment. The downside to that is that it means SVG clip > paths now need to know about contain:strictness, which is a bit of a bummer. > Not just clip-path but element() and fill:url() anything else that can use url() syntax to refer to an element in the document. Rob -- Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r "sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr, 'm aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t" uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n? gBoutt uIp waanndt wyeonut thoo mken.o w
Received on Thursday, 13 February 2014 08:49:59 UTC