W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2014

Re: [css-counter-styles] question about API

From: Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 09:49:57 +1100
Message-ID: <CAMdq698HhxjEBUC=sZ6U64O8Lcy+c82Ukca0V14Ax+T_+41mWg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 6:26 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I have a question that, if one descriptor is not specificed in rule
>> declaration, should the corresponding attribute return the initial
>> value defined for the descriptor or an empty string?
> Hmm, I'm actually not sure what the best behavior is.  The closest
> similar rule, @font-face, doesn't define it at all either:
> <http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-fonts/#om-fontface>
> I can go with either null, empty string, or initial value.  I'll let
> the group decide which makes the most sense.

Since the current draft says the getter must return a DOMString
object, maybe we can only choose from empty string and initial value.
In fact, from the implementation from Mozilla, I found it is hard to
return a null for a typed attribute. For this case, I prefer empty

Xidorn Quan
Received on Tuesday, 11 February 2014 22:51:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:19 UTC