- From: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 18:21:41 -0500
- To: "Tab Atkins, Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org, Tony Graham <tgraham@mentea.net>
Received on Saturday, 8 February 2014 23:22:09 UTC
Also please note that there is supposed to be someone creating a developer poll about whether this should remain !.x .y or be .x:has(.y) as per CSS WG discussion a few weeks back. On Feb 8, 2014 2:11 PM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 3:21 AM, Tony Graham <tgraham@mentea.net> wrote: > > Section 3.4., Determining the Subject of a Selector, [2] states "the > > subject of the selector can be explicitly identified by prepending an > > exclamation mark (!)" and has an example "!OL > LI:only-child" but also > > has Issue 3 about whether or not the exclamation mark should be prepended > > or appended to the subject. > > > > However, the overview table [1] includes the example "E! > F". Shouldn't > > that be "!E > F" at least until Issue 3 is resolved? > > You're right; fixed. > > ~TJ > >
Received on Saturday, 8 February 2014 23:22:09 UTC