- From: Stewart Brodie <sbrodie@espial.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 13:26:02 +0000
- To: <www-style@w3.org>
There are inconsistencies in the examples in "3.10. Backgrounds Shorthand:
the‘background’property", specifically regarding the background-repeat
property's value: examples 15 and 18 are different to the other examples.
Example 18 shows multiple comma separated values for the background
shorthand and describes the values assigned to each individual sub-property,
using this example:
background: url(a.png) top left no-repeat,
url(b.png) center / 100% 100% no-repeat,
url(c.png) white;
It explains that for background-repeat, this means:
background-repeat: no-repeat, no-repeat no-repeat, repeat;
I think it should be:
background-repeat: no-repeat, no-repeat, repeat;
If not, then why not?
This is the shorthand expansion, not the computed value, so the computed
value (which is "no-repeat no-repeat, no-repeat no-repeat, repeat repeat")
should not be relevant here and serialization would naturally collapse back
to "no-repeat, no-repeat, repeat" anyway (quotes used only to delimit value
from prose!)
Both of the expansions shown in example 15 have the same issue.
--
Stewart Brodie
Senior Software Engineer
Team Leader ANT Galio Browser
Espial UK
Received on Friday, 7 February 2014 13:26:43 UTC