- From: Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 15:24:03 -0800
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 6 February 2014 23:24:30 UTC
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote: > > [1] In fact, the original agreement on the thread was to support both > "public" and "private", in the sense that components could fully expose > their shadow innards or not, and then the default could be decided. Dmitri > even agreed to add support for a flag to decide this, but never did: < > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2012OctDec/0612.html>. > It doesn't mean I don't want to solve the problem. And the statements Shadow DOM being designed in a way that Type 2 encapsulation is not possible -- those are simply not true. The whole thing was carefully designed in a way to keep this option an incremental evolutionary step. :DG<
Received on Thursday, 6 February 2014 23:24:30 UTC