RE: Transition request: CR for css3-syntax [I18N-ACTION-285][I18N-ISSUE-279]

The Internationalization WG has reviewed the responses to the issue mentioned in the quote just below (from the CSS3 Syntax CR transition request [2]) in our teleconference today [1]. The WG has accepted the changes that were made to clarify the handling of @charset and that further changes to allow a more-permissive @charset syntax have been rejected.

As a result, all I18N comments have been satisfactorily addressed. Thanks!

Addison (for I18N)

Addison Phillips
Globalization Architect (Amazon Lab126)
Chair (W3C I18N WG)

Internationalization is not a feature.
It is an architecture.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2014/02/06-i18n-minutes.html#item07 
[2] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2014JanMar/0086.html 

> * Evidence that issues have been formally addressed
> 
> See the DoC: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-syntax/issues-LC-20131105

> 
> One comment (issue 3) was rejected and the commenters so far neither
> accepted nor objected, although they said they expect to object still.

Received on Thursday, 6 February 2014 21:13:20 UTC