- From: Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>
- Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 18:59:21 -0800
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
On 02/05/2014 06:40 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > Were you watching the #whatwg channel? Or is it just coincidence that > you bring this up when I answered a question for someone about this > exact issue earlier today? I think I was talking to that same guy on stackoverflow[1] -- I suggested using "min-height: 100%" on a grandchild of a flex container, and then noticed that it didn't work in Chrome, which prompted me to dig further & send this email. He mentioned there that he'd spoken to you & that you suggested something else that worked.) > And yes, Flexbox explicitly calls this out in its own definition of > "definite". (But that's really just a consequence of the general > definition.) Cool. That's what I thought; I just wanted to be sure the general definition's "specified explicitly" text wasn't meant to be taken too literally. Thanks for the quick response! I'll go ahead and file some bugs. ~Daniel [1] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/21515042/scrolling-a-flexbox-with-overflowing-content/21532162
Received on Thursday, 6 February 2014 02:59:48 UTC