- From: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>
- Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 12:46:14 -0800
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
(Sorry about revitalizing the horse) For display:block elements, what conceptually stops us from treating `vertical-align` exactly in the same way as in display:table-cell ? ( In display:table-cell vertical-align defines alignment of content relative to element's box ) Currently vertical-align align in this setup: { display:block; vertical-align:bottom; width:100px; height:100px; } is simply ignored. Example: http://terrainformatica.com/w3/valign.htm In order vertical-align to work we need to change display to { display:table-cell; vertical-align:bottom; width:100px; height:100px; } but that creates non desirable side effects due to peculiar treatment rules of display:table-cell's. If we will add support of vertical-align for blocks then we even can extend it to cover overflow cases: Consider this illustration: http://terrainformatica.com/w3/vertical-align-overflow.png That is about the case when content overflows and element uses overflow-y:hidden; There are quite many practical cases where such alignment behavior is highly required, think about sliding menus for example (vertical transition from height:0 to height:min-content). Another quite popular use case is log-alike lists like console message list in dev tools: #console-output { vertical-align:bottom; overflow-y:scroll; } in this case when user will not touch scrollbar on the list it will auto scrolled to the bottom when new content will arrive. I believe this functionality is so basic and asked for so frequently that we should do something about it. There is also a need for horizontal-align: left | center | right; if we want to reproduce <center> behavior in CSS. But that's probably another story. -- Andrew Fedoniouk. http://terrainformatica.com
Received on Saturday, 1 February 2014 20:46:41 UTC