- From: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
- Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 15:40:58 +0000
- To: MURAKAMI Shinyu <murakami@antenna.co.jp>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 2/1/14, 2:33 AM, "MURAKAMI Shinyu" <murakami@antenna.co.jp> wrote: >http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-writing-modes/#text-combine-compression > >> Example 20 >> For example, a simple OpenType-based implementation might compress >> the text as follows: >> 1. Enable 1/n-width glyphs for combined text of n characters. >> (I.e. Use OpenType hwid for 2 characters, twid for 3 characters, >> etc.) Note that the number of characters ≠ number of Unicode >> codepoints! >> 2. Horizontally scale the result to 1em if it is not yet 1em or >>narrower. > >In this description, "or narrower" in the last sentence seems a mistake. >Narrower text in tate-chu-yoko has no problem and should not scale to 1em, >nor change to full-width glyph for 1 character. >(Clarify n ≥ 2 in "Enable 1/n-width glyphs…") Yes, the sentence is saying to not scale the result if it is already narrower. Another way to phrase the sentence would be: 2. If the result is wider than 1em, scale the result to 1em. My sentence and the sentence in the draft are exactly equivalent. Thanks, Alan
Received on Saturday, 1 February 2014 15:41:30 UTC