- From: Rachel Andrew <rachelandrewuk@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 16:13:59 +0100
- To: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAAU94gFYpSWhKypU=2Bn_nD70HpZJfowv2yhiYdwP1Cm_Fsizw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi all, a quick question regarding implicit grid lines. Taking the following example, I am placing 'e' into a row that doesn't exist in my rows definition. So an implicit track is created to hold it. However my grid is using a track for a fixed gutter between row and column tracks, what I really want is a way to create that additional gutter track plus the row track. I think this is a common scenario with current grid systems that designers are using, is there a current way to get round this? It comes back to an earlier discussion about having something like column-gap, was that idea shelved? <!doctype html> <html> <head> <title>Testing creation of tracks on the implicit grid</title> <meta charset="utf-8"> <style> body { margin: 40px; } .wrapper { display: grid; grid-template-columns: 100px 10px 100px 10px 100px; grid-template-rows: auto 10px auto; background-color: #fff; color: #444; } .box { background-color: #444; color: #fff; border-radius: 5px; padding: 20px; font-size: 150%; } .a { grid-column: 1 / 4; grid-row: 1 / 2; } .b { grid-column: 5 / 6; grid-row: 1 / 4; } .c { grid-column: 1 / 2; grid-row: 3 / 4; } .d { grid-column: 3 / 4; grid-row: 3 / 4; } .e { grid-column: 1 / 4; grid-row: 4 / 5; } </style> </head> <body> <div class="wrapper"> <div class="box a">A</div> <div class="box b">B</div> <div class="box c">C</div> <div class="box d">D</div> <div class="box e">E</div> </div> </body> </html> -- Rachel Andrew http://rachelandrew.co.uk http://twitter.com/rachelandrew
Received on Sunday, 31 August 2014 15:14:26 UTC