On 8/28/14, 12:50 PM, "Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote: >On 8/28/14, 3:45 PM, Bogdan Brinza wrote: >> What is the expected right behavior in the second case? > >The rendering of this testcase is not fully defined by CSS right now, >because shrink-wrapping (and in particular the computation of the widths >involved in shrink-wrapping) is not fully defined. Given that changing the width of the scrolling element to auto causes both Chrome and Firefox to place it adjacent, I’d be in favor of defining the fixed-width case to place it adjacent as well. Thanks, AlanReceived on Thursday, 28 August 2014 19:57:08 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:43 UTC