- From: Sergio Villar Senin <svillar@igalia.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 12:43:30 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 22/08/14 02:36, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 2:34 AM, Sergio Villar Senin <svillar@igalia.com> wrote: >> The current spec allows implementors to cap the number of repetitions >> allowed for the repeat() function[1]. I'd like to propose to extend this >> to the values accepted by the grid positioning properties. The rationale >> behind this is that those positioning properties might act as grid >> definition properties (by creating implicit grid tracks), allowing >> authors to do things like: "grid-row-start: ARBITRARY_HUGE_NUMBER;" >> >> So my proposal would be to remove the special case of repeat() in the >> specs and replace it by a more general statement allowing implementors >> to cap the number of tracks, no matter if they're explicitly or >> implicitly defined. >> >> WDYT? > > Yes, this is an oversight in the spec; we didn't think of the fact > that positioning might create an overly-large implicit grid. I've > generalized the allowance to limit the size of the grid to apply to > the explicit and implicit grids in general. And there is another question, what would happen with the resolved values for grid-template-*? As they are the used values, I guess that we should output 0px for all the grid tracks over the limits, is that correct? BR
Received on Thursday, 28 August 2014 10:44:01 UTC