W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2014

[css-align] Editorial: the 'stretch' definition moved, but the section titles weren't updated accordingly

From: François REMY <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 16:08:42 +0200
Message-ID: <DUB130-DS2281F8AB09169123AF6560A5DC0@phx.gbl>
To: "CSS WG" <www-style@w3.org>
NOTE: This mail is targeting the current editor draft of CSS Box Alignment, 
not its current working draft, which is fine regarding this.

In more details, my comments are:
- Section 3.1's title still mentions ‘strecth’ (yet the section doesn't 
define it)
- Section 3.3's title doesn’t mention ‘stretch’ (yet the section does define 

I believe the section titles should be updated to match their content (or 

Best regards,
Received on Tuesday, 26 August 2014 14:09:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:45 UTC