W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2014

Re: Animation frame task

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 08:24:03 +0200
Message-ID: <CADnb78jkGiwRD44GOPDyq1ypyPuBYWFMS5=iTSYDbUXAoQ+JYw@mail.gmail.com>
To: James Robinson <jamesr@google.com>
Cc: "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>, "public-web-perf@w3.org" <public-web-perf@w3.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>, Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr>
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 2:52 AM, James Robinson <jamesr@google.com> wrote:
> How do they coordinate today?  They must at least post to the same task
> queue to preserve order.  I think what this gets as is the granularity of
> task considered by this algorithm.  Whatever is making sure that the
> fullscreen and screen orientation events are coherent today (i.e. running
> out of one task, running in the same task queue, whatever) should continue
> to work in this scheme as well.

I guess you're correct. Looking at the screen orientation
specification it seems to directly hook into the fullscreen element
stack changing. If we make that hook explicit there's no need for a
more complicated model than FIFO.

Received on Tuesday, 26 August 2014 06:24:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:45 UTC